Why Did Subprime Loans Become Such a Big Deal?
Monday, May 5th, 2008
Intelligent people, including my wife, have been asking me questions about the subprime mortgage crisis. The point that seems to stump them is why a relatively small percentage of subprime mortgage defaults has led to a spiraling national credit crisis, how it happened, and where do we go from here. They were good questions, and if you are wondering the same thing, read on…
So what’s the deal with the subprime mortgage meltdown?
Well, imagine that the markets involved are analogous to a house with three stories. Each of the floors represent an industry related to the housing market and each of the upper stories are dependent on the one right below it.
The first floor represents the primary mortgage market (homeowners and their banks or mortgage lenders)
The second level represents the secondary mortgage market (where government-enabled agencies and private lenders by bundled bank mortgages)
The third represents the credit derivatives market (where securities created in the secondary mortgage market are pooled again with other debts and with various risk preferences)
The primary mortgage market is huge, but the second and third levels are just as huge. It makes for a pretty big meltdown when it all starts to unravel.
When did they start lowering standards for homebuyers?
A lot of changes happened about twenty years ago, when the Tax Reform Act of 1986 introduced interest deductions on mortgages for homes, making mortgage debt cheaper than consumer debt for many homeowners. In addition, there was a concerted effort in economic policy to increase the share of homeownership in America. As a result, since 1986, the housing market has experienced 20 years of continued price increases. Even through the recession of 2001, while labor and stock markets weakened, the housing market continued to thrive with high volumes and steady price increases.
And along with the housing boom came the growth of the mortgage lending industry. Subprime lending was made possible because of laws such as the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act (1980) and the Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act (1982), which gave lenders the ability to charge high rates and fees, as well as variable interest rates and balloon payments.
However, it wasn’t until 1994, when an increase in interest rates caused a drop in prime mortgages, that brokers and mortgage companies turned to the subprime market to maintain the volume. During these times, subprime mortgages were relatively new and the long-term performances of these loans were unknown. In 1995, the size of the subprime loan market was estimated around $65 billion, but by 2007, subprime mortgages accounted for $1.3 trillion out of a total of $10 trillion in outstanding mortgages.
But how could so many lenders originate such huge volumes of mortgages? Where do they get their money?
From the secondary market, or the second floor of our imaginary house analogy. Mortgages, if you think of them as a consumer good, can actually be bundled and sold. And the government (and some private companies) bought them. After the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s, with the infamous “maturity mismatch” problem of lenders using short-term deposits to fund long-term mortgages, mortgages became tougher to acquire. So the government enabled agencies like Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac, to buy bank mortgages in the secondary mortgage market, which gave mortgage lenders a way to replenish their funds so that they could in turn originate more mortgages.
These government agencies (and some private companies also) then turned around and issued securities based on these mortgage debts as collaterals. And global investors, who wanted to participate in the U.S. housing market, bought a lot of these types of securities. And since 1980, the volume of government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities has risen from $200 billion to over $4 trillion. In addition, private mortgage insurers and mortgage pools (which include nonconforming loans) account for approximately $2 trillion.
The secondary market was an incentive, then, for banks to issue more loans?
Precisely. With the securitization of loans, banks and mortgage lenders effectively became mortgage originating and servicing business, which meant that mortgage lenders profits were based on the volume of mortgage originations. Since there was a huge growing secondary market willing to buy repackaged mortgage products that were ultimately based on these mortgages, the effective size of the mortgage market became much bigger than the size of the mortgage originations.
Then why would the secondary market buy the subprime loans? Don’t they have standards?
From the mid 1990s, the growth in securitization (10% of mortgages securitized in 1980 while 60% securitized now) led to dramatic growth in subprime lending as well, and by 2007, 75% of all subprime mortgages were securitized.
Now, the reason why subprime loans were able to be repackaged and sold in the secondary market , was entirely due to the existence of credit ratings agencies, such as Moody’s and Standard & Poors. Although they provide no guarantees, there is an overwhelming and even reckless reliance by investors on these agencies to give accurate ratings.
Rating agencies measure the credit risk, which is also referred to as default risk. Professional credit risk managers spend theirs careers developing credit risk models, but most models are based on two fundamental concepts: default probability and recovery rate. Together, the default probability and recovery rate give a good measurement of a debt’s quality and are often referred as credit spread. Combining these factors with a measurement of how much the creditor would lose if the counterparty defaulted (credit exposure) on a given debt, companies can calculate the expected loss of any given obligation. Now when the credit rating agency gives a stamp of approval, the tendency is for investors to not look at the quality of the underlying mortgages.
If we go back to our 3-story house, the credit ratings agencies are like the columns that are holding up the building; the foundation on which the columns are grounded are the assumption, based on historical figures, that house prices will continue to rise as they have since 1986. So when the house prices fell….
Then the second floor came crashing down? What a mess!
But the second floor is nothing compared to the third floor. The third floor represents the credit derivatives market, in which securities created in the secondary mortgage market are in turn pooled again with other debts and sold as slices (known as tranches) with various risk preferences. Banks, securities houses, hedge funds, and insurance companies buy these credit derivative instruments, called structured finance products.
Everyone benefited from credit derivatives:
- Banks could transfer the credit risk of loans through these derivative products, while keeping the loan on its books
- Investors could enhance the credit risk of obligations by isolating the credit risk, pricing it, and transferring it to other investors; and
- Investors could diversify their risk with credit derivatives such as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) or mortgages obligations (CMOs), which bundled together different types of credit risk and sold them as a portfolio product.
The frightening thing is that this third floor, though a relatively new development, is HUGE.
The credit derivatives market has had explosive growth only since the late 1990s. From $170 billion in 1997, currently the global credit derivatives market stands at estimated $20 trillion, surpassing the equity derivatives market and the corporate bond market. The CDO market alone is roughly $3 trillion—CDOs are useful because they can be used to dispose of high risk loans. Japanese banks used CDOs to clear up their loan books in the 1990s, as did Germany’s Dresdner Bank in 2003.
But who is holding this market together? You guessed it – the credit rating agency. It’s practically impossible for the investors in this market to understand or know the credit risk of the underlying securities when the underlying loans are pooled together from many different sources and are repackaged multiple times. So everyone just trusted the credit rating agencies to assign the appropriate risk rating.
How could they put so much trust in the rating agencies?
That is the biggest problem. Investors are interested in high returns, but only if they can trust the risk rating. Much of the global money has shifted away from the US stock market and into the real estate market since 2000 when the internet bubble burst. In the finance world, it’s all about risk-adjusted returns, and people don’t, or can’t, invest if risk can’t be accurately assessed.
So that is why the subprime debacle is a deeper problem than just these mortgages. It has revealed that the risk-pricing system by credit agencies is deeply suspect, which in turn has brought into suspicion not only subprime evaluations, but all other risk-based evaluations in the financial market.
Going back to the 3-story house analogy, imagine if the investors in the third floor realized that the columns have cracks in them (thus, risk of their investments were much higher than once believed). Not only would they want to shut down the third floor, they would want to exercise buyback provisions that permit investors to sell back loans that go bad within a specified period of time.
That’s how you get a case like Bear Sterns. Once everyone realizes that your underlying collateral is worth much less than expected because of the adjustments in credit ratings, the issuer is stuck with bad mortgages and the huge second and third floor activities suddenly freeze.
So what happens next? Are we going to buy a house this summer or not?
The problem was caused by credit rating agencies basing the credit risk of mortgages on the faulty assumption that the housing prices would continue to go up. So when house prices fell against expectations, all those industries we talked about suddenly found themselves on shaky foundations. Consequently, the secondary mortgage market participants are reducing mortgage purchases from the mortgage lenders, which means the mortgage lenders are stuck with bad mortgages. With liquidity dried up, mortgage lenders now have to tighten borrowing standards, which in turn causes house prices to fall even further. Potential disaster can be alleviated if the house prices start to go back up soon again. But I wouldn’t expect the house prices to turn up again any time soon, even though interest rates remain low.
The first order of priority, before expecting the house prices to rise, would be for the government and financial market participants to reevaluate the credit rating agencies, credit risk pricing models, and structured finance products in general. There is also the whole potential legal mess involving the mortgage insurers. It’s going to be a long road back.
As to buying a house, let’s wait.
Related in the Graziadio Business Report
Will the Sub-Prime Meltdown Burst the Housing Bubble? by Peggy J. Crawford, PhD, and Terry Young, PhD
Is the Real Estate Market a House of Cards? by Peggy J. Crawford, PhD, and Terry Young, PhD
The Book Corner Recommends: The Foreclosures.Com Guide to Making Huge Profits Investing in Preforeclosures without Selling Your Soul by Michael Kinsman, CPA, PhD
Topic: America's Financial Crisis, In the News, Real Estate
Tags: cdo, cmo, credit derivative, Finance, mortgage, Real Estate, securities, subprime
Leave a Reply
By submitting a comment here you grant Graziadio Business Review Blog a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate or irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin's discretion.


Comments
MoneyBeat.com | Canadian Mortgage
May 6, 2008 at 12:00 PM
This is an awesome conceptualization. Very helpful. Out of curiosity, have there been any particular agencies tasked with reevaluating the credit rating agencies? It seems like that’s a task fraught with conflicts of interest and could take forever.
Abraham Park
May 7, 2008 at 6:14 PM
Thanks for the comment, Canadian Mortgage. US Senate Banking Committee is looking into this. They have a long road ahead to revamp the rating agencies and the models they use.
Overland Park Real Estate
May 9, 2008 at 6:21 AM
Great post. The portion about “When did they start lowering standards for homebuyers?” highlights the progression over the long term but I even saw standards really change over the 7 years I have been in the real estate business. It use to be that 100% loans were almost impossible or at least very rare to be able to get. From around 2003 – 2007 it seemed like everyone was getting 100% loans, or even 103% in some cases. It was almost expected by buyers that they could get into a home with no money down.
Danielle L. Scott
May 9, 2008 at 8:17 AM
@ Canadian Mortgage: Here is a link to the latest U.S. Senate Committee on Banking’s hearing on “Turmoil in U.S. Credit Markets: The Role of the Credit Rating Agencies” (4/22/08):
http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?Fuseaction=Hearings.Detail&HearingID=709b68d2-6e2b-4048-bf86-19fdc01ecec3
You can listen to the hearing and read various statements from senators and witnesses (SEC, Moody’s, Fitch, R.W. Pressprich, etc) on the topic.
Xiaomei
May 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM
Dr. Park, in your opinion, will we see crdit card crisis coming soon as homeowners stretch their credit limits to catch up mortgages?
Paige
May 15, 2008 at 2:37 PM
Professor Park –
Thank you – this blog and your imagery were incredibly helpful to understanding this mess. Without asking you to disclose your political leanings, I would be interested to read what role you think the US government should take in fixing this situation and what, if anything, you think should have been done to prevent it.
I would also be very interested in your reply to Xiaomei’s question.
Woodstock Real Estate
May 20, 2008 at 5:57 AM
We have a similar problem here in the Woodstock, GA real estate market. You have done a great job in helping the public my real estate agents understand the current situation.
Charles
June 12, 2008 at 6:54 PM
Sadly Las Vegas had a huge number of these loans. Several companies went under and foreclosures are skyrocketing. But home prices have stopped falling and sales are picking up.
Florida real estate
June 28, 2008 at 12:10 PM
“As to buying a house, let’s wait.”
Doesn’t that depend on the individual circumstance? If an investor or homeowner is buying a home and intends to keep the home for 5-7 years minimum, does it maater what is happening now?
“And along with the housing boom came the growth of the mortgage lending industry.”
And the onslaught of everyone and his plumber originating these loans. It seemed everyone in Florida during the boom was either a home flipper, real estate agent or a mortgage rep.
Donald Cameron
July 11, 2008 at 10:42 AM
A couple of comments / corrections. MOrtgage interest was fully deductible long before the tax reform act of 1986. However, that deductibility, and the deductibility of property taxes has been a strong selling factor in the real estate process, especially for first time home buyers. Variable rate interest loans, in which the rate and timing of increases and decreawe4s (1/4 % each 6 months, maximum up 2.5% and down 2.5 % were introduced in 1979. Adjustible rate ooans, in which there were far fewer constraints a year later. For some time, the O. T. S. (OFfice of thrift suopervision) regularly set standards for how lon the introductory, or teaser, rates could be. IN recent years, they seemed to look away from that, particularly as mortgage bankers. who were not regulated by them began offering loans with much lower start rates. IN addition, the O.T.S. had rules governing the rates at which borrowers werew aualified for their mortgages, the mortgage bankers had no such rules. I must assume this lack of watching on the thrifts was to try to level the playing field.
I was once the C.O.O. of a thrift-owned mortgage compoany.
Mark
July 11, 2008 at 9:32 PM
How come there wasn’t any mention of the ‘community reinvestment act?’ This program encourages lenders to make risky (subprime) loans.
Jim Grapes
July 18, 2008 at 8:54 PM
“It’s practically impossible for the investors in this market to understand or know the credit risk of the underlying securities when the underlying loans are pooled together from many different sources and are repackaged multiple times.”
When it seems to good to be true…..
Buy My House
August 7, 2008 at 4:13 AM
Here in the UK lenders have tightened their criteria for lending, pushed up their interest rates, and withdrawn many of their popular products. This, they say, is due to the ‘credit crunch’ that has hit the UK, and the fact that overseas financial institutions are no longer lender them any money. Our Government responded to this by gifting them billions of pounds to try and alleviate the problem. However nothing has changed, in fact interest rates continue to go up, and lending is as tight as ever. Why the Government did not ask for something in return for their billions of pounds from these lenders – well who knows? It has not helped the housing market one iota.
STOCK MARKET
September 11, 2008 at 5:00 PM
The sub prime mortgage crisis has reached a tipping point with Freddie and Fannie as well as Bear sterns being taken over. There has never been government intervention needed to support so many mortgage giants in such a short space of time. We need to watch these proceedings carefully.
Al
September 22, 2008 at 8:07 AM
Very interesting article. Thanks for the valuable insight Professor Park
Robert Taylor
September 24, 2008 at 8:51 AM
Didn’t this fiasco really start in l977 with regulations that required mortgage lenders to make loans to individuals or areas they were “redlining”?
Think Money
September 29, 2008 at 5:54 AM
That is an excellent article. Thankyou for taking the time to write it.
Colin
Jonathan
October 1, 2008 at 6:39 PM
This was a 911 attack to our economy. They took the high price gas money and reinvested in short term subprime mortgage securities. Go and read 1980 Latin America Debt Crises as they have done this once and collapsed Argentina, Brazil, Mexico economy and learned from it to harm us and the rest of the world. When are we going to have our Homeland Security to look into it? When?
Sell My House Fast Virginia Beach
November 17, 2008 at 11:54 PM
Yes, this indeed is well written. I wish the banker
would read it. Honestly, why do they have to tighten
up so much now? Do you know how hard it is for a well qualified
responsible credit worthy person to get a simple loan.
It is ridiculous. The overreaction is what is
killing the economy now. It would also be great if
banks offered feedback on how much they would lend
for a house and not just decline the loan. There is
a lot of incompetence in the banking industry. Originating
with those no-money secondary market loans, and now
with the over super qualifying loans.
-David G.
sell virginia house fast
Bahrain Real Estate Agent
November 28, 2008 at 2:54 AM
Wow this is a great blog post Prof. Park. What you wrote back in May is exactly how things are turning out.
Jodi Suguitan
November 29, 2008 at 7:54 PM
Very well written and complete explanation! Hopefully some of the negative inventory sitting on the real estate markets will get pushed through soon and the rebuilding of equity can begin.
Oxford MS Realtor
December 24, 2008 at 6:21 PM
Too many people got homes they couldnt afford. its too bad really
George Farmer
December 31, 2008 at 11:20 AM
We saw tons of 100% mortgages!
Simulation pret immobilier
January 21, 2009 at 7:47 PM
This article is a very good overview at what happened in the U.S. with the subprime. Basically, bad decisions from banks are resulting in catastrophic impacts.
George Farmer
January 26, 2009 at 9:57 AM
We even sold a fresh out of college student a home for $250,000, no money down at all, seller paid the closing costs!
Eugenie
March 5, 2009 at 6:22 AM
wow. that is alot of information. I dont even know if I could do all that. And thank you so much for lettming me in on all the info.
david
March 24, 2009 at 10:47 AM
great blog post with complete explanation. i like it
Online Scrum Tool
May 12, 2009 at 12:09 AM
Thanks for the valuable insight Professor Park. How do you see the Middle East real estate market doing over the next 12 months?
FHA Approved Appraisers
May 14, 2009 at 9:54 PM
Great information! Thanks for writing a detailed post. Unfortunately a lot of people got into purchasing homes they couldn’t really afford and are facing some really difficult times of their lives.
NYC Condo Man
November 4, 2009 at 9:30 AM
Tremendous detail and very informative.
Thanks for the post.
theloaner12
December 10, 2009 at 3:58 PM
Wow this is really interesting when you break it down and look at it. It shows how much subprime loans have hammered out economy
Loan Modification
December 11, 2009 at 8:17 AM
Nice, informative article, good breakdown of the credit crisis. Especially like the graphic.
commercial office space
January 14, 2010 at 4:11 PM
Finally somebody who writes the truth. I work in las vegas nevada for a commercial real estate company and we’ve seen it here. I just keep moving forward and working hard.
thx for the post
Ken Schmidt
February 3, 2010 at 7:59 AM
It’s amazing how complex this gets! It will be intereting to see how the rest of this unfolds over the next couple of years and how many lessons our financial institutions will learn. Lets hope nothing like this ever happens again!
7 Bankruptcy
February 11, 2010 at 3:15 PM
Big banks and finance knew these complicated financial products were junk. They dumped them on the market and profited handsomely.
Federal Debt Relief Program
February 12, 2010 at 11:10 AM
In regards to why did they start lowering credit standards for homebuyers, one could argue it was to offer mortgages to people who the lenders knew could not possibly afford in the long term.
Lisa Gergets
March 25, 2010 at 5:47 PM
People get mortgages they can’t afford…lenders let them…the government simply turns to look the other way. It’s a never-ending cycle that, even in the current financial climate, still will not end.
Gaye Ochsenbein
April 2, 2010 at 8:54 AM
A good post please keep going
Garret Kuschel
April 5, 2010 at 1:36 AM
Please, are you able to PM me and notify me couple of far more thinks about this, I’m truly fan of your website…
housing crisis
April 27, 2010 at 8:48 PM
What a fantastic explanation to what happened to the subprime mortgage. What strikes me, is that when this post was written nearly two years ago, you were correct about everything. I do not think we are even close to bottom yet and places like Las Vegas, where I live, are dropping so fast and violently, nearly a few hundred thousand people or more may find that their lives, if they haven’t already, will be completely changed forever. I do not see this housing correction in Las Vegas specifically changing in my lifetime. Any predictions? Thanks so much!
Esther Kriese
May 7, 2010 at 2:12 AM
Thanks very much for a nice little read.
Buy Chanel Handbags
June 3, 2010 at 1:48 AM
It will be intereting to see how the rest of this unfolds over the next couple of years and how many lessons our financial institutions will learn. Lets hope nothing like this ever happens again!
Antonio Wafula
June 4, 2010 at 11:53 PM
Wow, this is a great site. Thanks for the share =)
Hywel Morgan
June 6, 2010 at 6:03 AM
Very interesting article Professor Park. Would you care to give us your present day insight two years on?
Mesa Bankruptcy Attorney
June 16, 2010 at 9:35 AM
This was a 911 attack to our economy. They took the high price gas money and reinvested in short term subprime mortgage securities. Go and read 1980 Latin America Debt Crises as they have done this once and collapsed Argentina, Brazil, Mexico economy and learned from it to harm us and the rest of the world. When are we going to have our Homeland Security to look into it? When?
snoring solutions
June 23, 2010 at 9:11 PM
It will be intereting to see how the rest of this unfolds over the next couple of years and how many lessons our financial institutions will learn. Lets hope nothing like this ever happens again!
Property Classified
July 23, 2010 at 9:04 PM
Thanks for sharing this..
It’s been a couple of years since the crisis began, and the economy is still not up to where it was before the crisis yet.
It’s interesting to see how many more years needed for the government to get the economy back on track.
Internet Entrepreneur
July 24, 2010 at 10:41 AM
Subprime mortgage is not the culprit. But the way of dispursal is the reason for the credit crisis. Every security norms had been thrown away by the banks to defeat business competition and to earn a huge profit.
Buytoletmortgages
July 28, 2010 at 2:39 PM
Subprime loans are not the problem, they were badly written debts by hungry banks.
Chandler Realtor
September 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM
Great post, I am asked about this all the time!
San Diego Bankruptcy Lawyer
September 10, 2010 at 8:08 AM
Prof. Park-
As a bankruptcy attorney I see so many people who’s mortgages spiraled out of control and they now face foreclosure. Really, it doesn’t look like it is getting any better. Thanks for the information.
Anthony
Chandler realtor
September 13, 2010 at 11:15 AM
Great post, I love how you break everything down.
Arizona Golf Course Homes
September 20, 2010 at 3:07 PM
Well its been over two years since this article was published and things don’t seem to be any better now than they were then, maybe even a little worse. I guess we need to just hope for the light at the end of the tunnel. One thing is for certain, we’re closer to it now than we were in May 2008!
Brooklyn Real Estate
November 1, 2010 at 6:52 AM
First off – great info-graphic, great way to give a picture depicting the market.
The economy is still down, as it was in 2008 – However, there are still hopes for the future. There have been some credits given to new home-buyers which is at least an attempt to alleviate this situation. Hopefully, we continue to keep the money moving in the real estate market.
Birmingham Electricians
November 4, 2010 at 12:39 PM
In Birmingham, we haven’t had it as bad as other areas. My friends in Tampa are in completely different situations that us.
Jarl Kubat
November 26, 2010 at 7:51 AM
This whole mortgage debacle has left many families in shambles. Our country is near collapse and the people that are suppose to navigate us through this mess understands it.
H. Tieben
November 29, 2010 at 3:16 AM
Not only subprime loans were the problem, you can see the same now in Europe (Greece, Ireland etc.)
H. Tieben
http://www.mth-partner.de
Anna Holland
February 8, 2011 at 12:28 AM
There really is no solution to that problem.
Of course there are government agencies that help pay mortgages but the government also has to help banks that go bankrupt because they will cripple the economy.
-Anna of Eton Properties
Cornerstone Properties
March 22, 2011 at 1:27 PM
A loan that is made at a higher interest rate than most other loans. Subprime loans are made to borrowers who do not qualify for ordinary loans because of bad credit history or some other reason.
CT Real Estate
May 18, 2011 at 1:56 PM
It is sad, that to this day business, despite record piles of cash, are not hiring more. It is the only way to get the country on its feet again, yet private business can’t get their act together to help not just the USA, but the world. I wonder when this sub-prime mess will ever be behind us.
Bankruptcy Attorney San Diego
August 2, 2011 at 5:09 PM
The relatively small number of mortgage defaults is a huge number for the credit markets to absorb and it is growing. In San Diego, California, for example, mortgage defaults are continuing at the pace they have been for the past year and the pace does not appear to be slowing. Mark, Bankruptcy Attorney in San Diego.
what is mortgage rate today
August 23, 2011 at 2:46 PM
They were trying to get out of their stake but there is a ton of Chinese bank equity sales and Then again, I’ve never understood why ANY small investor would use a high-service brokerage, given their long long record of selling inferior branded products with high costs and poor performance.
Richard
September 7, 2011 at 9:57 PM
Interesting post :)
Norm
September 26, 2011 at 7:35 PM
Call me wind because I am abolsuelty blown away.
Audra Quinn, Managing Editor
October 3, 2011 at 8:49 AM
Thank you Luther! We are looking into it now. I greatly appreciate you bringing this matter to my attention.
Best,
Audra Quinn
Managing Editor
NewsView
November 12, 2011 at 3:07 PM
You say that the derivatives market took off in the mid 1990s.
Question: Did the derivatives market exist in the US before The Financial Modernization Act of 1999? Or if it did exist was it a dominate source of risk — in the trillions of dollars — to all the other layers in the market?
How did banking deregulation and the rise of the “institutional speculator” play a role in the development of the derivatives market?
If we argue that in the past markets were driven by rational risk taking on the basis of success — or at least cutting your losses before its too late — does not the incentive to bet on market losses encourage an ironic “rationality of unacceptable risk”?
By way of example the documentary, “House of Cards”, depicts a trader who made a killing speculating that the bubble would burst. Hence my question: Would betting money on the probability of loss have been possible ~30-odd years ago?
ozz
November 21, 2011 at 1:18 PM
great post with your model you can see where the mass of theft took place
on the second and third floor.
Free Education Aid
December 21, 2011 at 9:15 PM
Well its been over two years since this article was published and things don’t seem to be any better now than they were then, maybe even a little worse. thanks for information..I really like to know more about subprime mortgage crisis.
Free Education Aid
January 3, 2012 at 10:51 PM
very well written, Hopefully some of the negative inventory sitting on the real estate markets will get pushed through soon. There have been some credits given to new home-buyers which is at least an attempt to alleviate this situation.
Trackbacks